LAWS OF KNOWİNG ( ARTICLE )

 

LAWS OF KNOWING ( ARTICLE )

    According to Thomas khun, it has been said that it is right for a committee of scientists to decide on the scientific evaluation of a theory. This theory of Thomas Khun cannot always be valid because the mind of the owner of the theory has understood and assimilated this theory. While theory passes through the minds of what they call scientists, it is unclear whether people on the scientific committee have the capacity to understand the developed theory. Furthermore, the fact that all the scientists present there approve of the theory indicates that the theory is not very realistic, because a theory loses its falsifiability principle. In fact, the fact that all scientists voted to accept that theory is nothing but burying the theory in obscurity by blocking the falsifiability of that theory.

An evaluation theory that is not equal to or close to the duration of the thought formation and writing phase of a proposed theory and the psychology, biology and sociology phases of the theory is wrong. In order for the committee evaluating the theory to get closer to the essence of the theory, it should have spent close to or similar times in the same processes. and a dialectical opposition must emerge from the committee. In the formation of a scientific theory in ancient times, the ideas, views and ideas that were put forward in the time of the philosophers of the first age were developed and interpreted without the need for a validation committee.

Contrary to Popperin Khun, he says that it may be valid for people who evaluate scientificness to make scientific evaluations away from their psychosocial effects. I don't think it's right to agree with this view. Because people are under the influence of both individual psychology and social psychology when making decisions, it is impossible not to be affected by scientific theories for the social and psychological accumulation that accumulates in the field of mind.

Even if the scientific evaluation committee rejects or accepts a theory for the moment, since the theory they accept may be falsified or insufficient in the future, or the theory they reject may be confirmed in the future, opinions cannot be certain.

In order for an opinion to be adopted by another mind, the opposite mind's persuasion or acceptance is required. If there is no mental resemblance like the mirror image, there is no persuasion or acceptance. Even if someone adopts another view, they cannot fully grasp the essence of that view, because the formation of an idea, an idea, was formed by that person's emotional state and past experience, and adopting it is not a complete acceptance. because only the owner of the view can know the effect and reaction of the source of an opinion,

Confirmation of the scientific evaluation norms in the current place does not make it absolutely correct, because in another place and time there may be an opinion that can refute that view. If you cannot fully transfer a view to another mind, fuzzy logic emerges.

It is wrong to attribute scientific evaluations to the opinions of only a few people . because individuals who have attained scientific status but do not have a status can continue to exist in the society.

Dusty mind: In order to explain our opinion, our opinion to someone else and to accept it, the mind of the subject in front of us must be clear and pure.

Emile Durkheim produced the concept of collective consciousness and made great contributions to philosophy. but there is a collective consciousness from society to society and small collective consciousnesses formed by groups of the smallest individual in society. There are masculine collective consciousnesses, feminine collective consciousnesses, neutral collective consciousnesses, status collectives, social, psychological collective, biological, physical, metaphysical chemical collective consciousness, oppositional and accepting and unstable collective consciousnesses. There are national, international, racial, anti-racial, legal, ideological collective consciousnesses.

Subsequent questioning: In the formation of collective consciousness, natural consciousness, not individual consciousness, is effective, the human species cannot make sense of something alone, it will surely learn from another by developing an effect and reaction. ability is an artificial concept that develops by trial and error, which cannot be started based on time.

Similar consciousness: Individual consciousness has developed as a result of the formation of nature consciousness and the collective consciousness produced by the human species. but this individual consciousness is not an individual consciousness that starts with birth, it is an individual consciousness that develops afterwards. This consciousness, which derives from the combination of natural and collective consciousness, is not a true individual and free consciousness, but a like consciousness.

Philosophy and its derivatives consisting of similar Consciousness are not pure science, but an effort to purify the fuzzy consciousness itself. To put the derivatives of science and philosophy in an order, to surround it with borders is not to be scientific, but to exclude scientificity.

Aristotle made a mistake by saying that every living thing naturally desires to know. because the human species has learned the desire to know after external influence. In fact, when a person is born, there is no desire to know, this desire is formed by the influence of those around him. Locke tells the truth when he says that people like to follow the truth, but every person does not follow the east, there is a type of person who loves to go after something that is wrong.

The liberation of the orthodox view of science is a fairy tale. The fact that the majority accepts something as true does not mean that it is true. may be right, mostly wrong or right..Bacon was partially wrong when he said that knowledge is power because knowledge is not always power and does not always heal people, sometimes too much information and harmful information can disturb people. Finally, the physicist Ernest Rutter Ford is making a big mistake when he says that all sciences are stamp collections except physics. because while saying this, he is saying it based on philosophy and he is denying himself.

10. 06.2023

Article creator - author

Muzaffer GUNALTAY